[Synthetic indicator of compliance with standards for Quality Units of health centers and multicenter prospective pilot study]. / Indicador sintético de cumplimiento de estándares para Unidades de Calidad de centros sanitarios y estudio de pilotaje prospectivo multicéntrico.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In Spain, Quality Units play a key and unique role in advising healthcare centers on the methodology of healthcare quality. The objectives of the study were to develop computer algorithms to obtain a synthetic indicator of standard compliance for Quality Units and to pilot its functioning in these units. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Excel program was used to establish evaluation algorithms, and quantitatively interrelate and weight various categories of standards, as a computer evaluation tool, to build a continuous improvement cycle system, and offer a global synthetic indicator of compliance. The tool was tested in a prospective multicenter pilot study, in which coordinators of Quality Units from different health centers and care settings participated, to evaluate the usefulness of the tool and compliance with the standards, in addition to analyzing the content validity of each standard. RESULTS: The formulas for the structured computer algorithms were developed, consecutively, in a «PLAN-DO-CHECK-ACT¼ improvement cycle for the 9 categories of standards, resulting in a single synthetic indicator of compliance. Twenty-one Quality Units participated in the piloting. The overall average compliance rate for the synthetic indicator was 55.63% with differences between centers (P=.002) and between categories (P<.0001), but not by autonomous communities (P=.86) or by areas (P=.97). Content validity was ensured through the variable of «understanding¼ of the standards (P<.001), and through their «justification¼ with documentary evidence (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The computer tool with the synthetic indicator have allowed for the evaluation of standard compliance in Quality Units of healthcare centers.

Gut microbiome as a key monitoring indicator for reintroductions of captive animals.

Reintroduction programs seek to restore degraded populations and reverse biodiversity loss. To examine the hypothesis that gut symbionts could be used as an indicator of reintroduction success, we performed intensive metagenomic monitoring over 10 years to characterize the ecological succession and adaptive evolution of the gut symbionts of captive giant pandas reintroduced to the wild. We collected 63 fecal samples from 3 reintroduced individuals and 22 from 9 wild individuals and used 96 publicly available samples from another 3 captive individuals. By microbial composition analysis, we identified 3 community clusters of the gut microbiome (here termed enterotypes) with interenterotype succession that was closely related to the reintroduction process. Each of the 3 enterotypes was identified based on significant variation in the levels of 1 of 3 genera: Clostridium, Pseudomonas, and Escherichia. The enterotype of captive pandas was Escherichia. This enterotype was gradually replaced by the Clostridium enterotype during the wild-training process, which in turn was replaced by the Pseudomonas enterotype that resembled the enterotype of wild pandas, an indicator of conversion to wildness and a successful reintroduction. We also isolated 1 strain of Pseudomonas protegens from the wild enterotype, a previously reported free-living microbe, and found that its within-host evolution contributed to host dietary adaptation in the wild. Monitoring gut microbial structure provides a novel, noninvasive tool that can be used as an indicator of successful reintroduction of a captive individual to the wild.

Microbiomas intestinales como indicadores clave de monitoreo para la reintroducción de animales cautivos Resumen Los programas de reintroducción buscan restaurar las poblaciones degradadas y revertir la pérdida de la biodiversidad. Realizamos un monitoreo metagenómico intensivo durante más de diez años para caracterizar la sucesión ecológica y la evolución adaptativa de los simbiontes intestinales de pandas reintroducidos en la naturaleza y así comprobar la hipótesis de que estos simbiontes pueden usarse como indicadores de una reintroducción exitosa. Recolectamos 63 muestras fecales de tres individuos reintroducidos y 22 de nueve individuos silvestres y usamos 96 muestras disponibles al público de otros tres individuos cautivos. Mediante el análisis de la composición microbiana identificamos tres grupos comunitarios del microbioma intestinal (denominados como enterotipos) con una sucesión entre enterotipos relacionada cercanamente al proceso de reintroducción. Identificamos cada uno de los tres enterotipos con base en la variación significativa en los niveles de uno de los tres géneros: Clostridium, Pseudomonas, y Escherichia. El enterotipo de los pandas cautivos fue Escherichia. A este enterotipo lo reemplazó gradualmente el enterotipo de Clostridium durante el proceso de adaptación a la naturaleza, y a su vez fue reemplazado por el enterotipo de Pseudomonas similar al de los pandas silvestres, un indicador de la conversión a la vida silvestre y de una reintroducción exitosa. También aislamos una cepa de Pseudomonas protegens del enterotipo silvestre, un microbio reportado previamente como de vida libre, y descubrimos que su evolución dentro del hospedero contribuyó a que este se adaptara a la naturaleza de la dieta. El monitoreo de la estructura microbiana intestinal proporciona una herramienta novedosa y no invasiva que puede usarse como indicador del éxito de la reintroducción de un individuo cautivo a la naturaleza.

Proyecto CUDERMA: Consenso Delphi de los indicadores de calidad para la certificación de las unidades de dermatología de atención en psoriasis / Selection of Quality Indicators for the Certification of Psoriasis Units: The CUDERMA Project Delphi Consensus Study

La definición de indicadores de calidad es una estrategia clave para garantizar la calidad de la asistencia sanitaria y su homogenización. Así, el proyecto CUDERMA surge como una iniciativa de la AEDV para definir indicadores de calidad con los que certificar unidades de distintos campos de interés en la dermatología, de los que se seleccionaron psoriasis y dermatooncología de forma inicial. El objetivo de este trabajo fue consensuar los aspectos a evaluar por los indicadores en la certificación de las unidades de psoriasis. Para ello se siguió un proceso estructurado que contempló la revisión bibliográfica de indicadores, la elaboración de un set preliminar revisado por un grupo de expertos multidisciplinar y el consenso Delphi. Un panel de 39 dermatólogos evaluó los indicadores, y los clasificó como «básicos» o «de excelencia». Finalmente se consensuaron 67 indicadores que serán estandarizados para diseñar la norma con la que certificar las unidades de psoriasis (AU)

Defining quality indicators is a key strategy for ensuring the quality and standardization of health care. The CUDERMA project, an initiative of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venerology (AEDV), was undertaken to define quality indicators for the certification of specialized units in dermatology; the first 2 areas selected were psoriasis and dermato-oncology. The aim of this study was to reach a consensus on what should be assessed by the indicators used to certify psoriasis units. The structured process used to do this comprised a literature review to identify potential indicators, the selection of an initial set of indicators to be evaluated by a multidisciplinary group of experts and, finally, a Delphi consensus study. A panel of 39 dermatologists evaluated the selected indicators and classified them as either “essential” or “of excellence”. Consensus was finally reached on 67 indicators, which will be standardized and used to develop the certification standard for psoriasis units (AU)

[Translated article] Selection of Quality Indicators for the Certification of Psoriasis Units: The CUDERMA Project Delphi Consensus Study / Proyecto CUDERMA: Consenso Delphi de los indicadores de calidad para la certificación de las unidades de dermatología de atención en psoriasis

Defining quality indicators is a key strategy for ensuring the quality and standardization of health care. The CUDERMA project, an initiative of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venerology (AEDV), was undertaken to define quality indicators for the certification of specialized units in dermatology; the first 2 areas selected were psoriasis and dermato-oncology. The aim of this study was to reach a consensus on what should be assessed by the indicators used to certify psoriasis units. The structured process used to do this comprised a literature review to identify potential indicators, the selection of an initial set of indicators to be evaluated by a multidisciplinary group of experts and, finally, a Delphi consensus study. A panel of 39 dermatologists evaluated the selected indicators and classified them as either “essential” or “of excellence”. Consensus was finally reached on 67 indicators, which will be standardized and used to develop the certification standard for psoriasis units (AU)

La definición de indicadores de calidad es una estrategia clave para garantizar la calidad de la asistencia sanitaria y su homogenización. Así, el proyecto CUDERMA surge como una iniciativa de la AEDV para definir indicadores de calidad con los que certificar unidades de distintos campos de interés en la dermatología, de los que se seleccionaron psoriasis y dermatooncología de forma inicial. El objetivo de este trabajo fue consensuar los aspectos a evaluar por los indicadores en la certificación de las unidades de psoriasis. Para ello se siguió un proceso estructurado que contempló la revisión bibliográfica de indicadores, la elaboración de un set preliminar revisado por un grupo de expertos multidisciplinar y el consenso Delphi. Un panel de 39 dermatólogos evaluó los indicadores, y los clasificó como «básicos» o «de excelencia». Finalmente se consensuaron 67 indicadores que serán estandarizados para diseñar la norma con la que certificar las unidades de psoriasis (AU)

Mortalidad Materna en Venezuela: aspectos médicos y Políticas (1940 - 2016) / Materna Mortality in Venezuela: medical issues and Public Policy (1940 - 2016)

En la actualidad Venezuela se encuentra en una crisis social y económica sin precedentes. La mortalidad materna(MM) es un indicador en salud importante, debido a que permite tener idea de la atención médica de un país; se mide a través de dos indicadores: Razón de Mortalidad Materna (RMM) y Tasa de Mortalidad Materna (TMM). Objetivo: Revisar y compararla evolución de ambos indicadores de MM desde la década de 1930 hasta la década 2000. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión de la literatura y de informes técnicos de organismos gubernamentales y no gubernamentales para el análisis de la situación previa y reciente de esta situación en Venezuela. Los resultados señalan que existe una notable disminución de las cifras de MM como ha de esperarse con el mejoramiento de la tecnología desde la década de 1930 hasta el año 2000; posteriormente ocurre un retroceso de la sanidad pública con cifras comparables a la década de 1960. Concluimos que la MM ha sido desde tiempos pasados un problema constante en la salud pública; al pasar los años y gobiernos, se han implementado numerosas políticas públicas para mejorar esta situación, muchas de estas estrategias han sido fallidas debido a la falta de su continuidad y de su cumplimiento pleno.

Venezuela is currently in an unprecedented socialand economic crisis. Maternal mortality is an important health indicator because it provides an idea of a country's medical care. Maternal mortality is usually measured through two indicators: Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) and Maternal Mortality Rate. Objective: Review and compare the evolution of both healthindicators from the 1930s to 2016. Methods: A review of the literature and technical reports from governmental andnon-governmental organizations was carried out to analyze theprevious and recent situation. of this situation in Venezuela. Theresults indicate that there is a notable decrease in the figures ofmaternal mortality, as should be expected with the improvementof technology from the 1930s to the year 2000. Subsequently, there is a decline in public health with figures comparable to the1960s. We conclude that maternal mortality has been a constant problem in public health since ancient times. Over the years and governments, numerous public policies have been implementedto improve this situation. Many of these strategies have beenfailed due to lack of continuity and in the absence of its full compliance.

Proyecto CUDERMA: Consenso Delphi de los indicadores de calidad para la certificación de las unidades de dermatología de atención en dermato-oncología / Selection of Quality Indicators for the Certification of Dermato-Oncology Units: The CUDERMA Project Delphi Consensus Study

Los indicadores de calidad son una herramienta clave como garantía de calidad y homogenización de la asistencia sanitaria. En este contexto, la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología ha diseñado el proyecto CUDERMA (Certificación de unidades de dermatología), una iniciativa que busca definir indicadores de calidad para certificar unidades de dermatología en distintos ámbitos, entre los que se seleccionaron psoriasis y dermato-oncología de forma inicial. Este estudio tuvo por objetivo consensuar los aspectos a evaluar por los indicadores, siguiendo un proceso estructurado para la revisión bibliográfica y elaboración de un set preliminar de indicadores, revisado por un grupo multidisciplinar de expertos, para su evaluación mediante un Consenso Delphi. Un panel de 28 dermatólogos evaluó los indicadores y los clasificó como «básicos» o «de excelencia», generando un conjunto de 84 indicadores consensuados que serán estandarizados para diseñar la norma con la que certificar las unidades de dermato-oncología (AU)

Quality indicators are crucial for standardizing and guaranteeing the quality of health care practices. The Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) launched the CUDERMA Project to define quality indicators for the certification of specialized units in dermatology; the first 2areas selected were psoriasis and dermato-oncology. The aim of this study was to achieve consensus on what should be evaluated by these indicators using a structured process comprising a literature review and selection of an initial list of indicators to be evaluated in a Delphi consensus study following review by a multidisciplinary group of experts. The selected indicators were evaluated by a panel of 28 dermatologists and classified as either «essential» or «of excellence». The panel agreed on 84 indicators, which will be standardized and used to develop the certification standard for dermato-oncology units (AU)

[Translated article] Selection of Quality Indicators for the Certification of Dermato-Oncology Units: The CUDERMA Project Delphi Consensus Study / Proyecto CUDERMA: Consenso Delphi de los indicadores de calidad para la certificación de las unidades de dermatología de atención en dermato-oncología

Quality indicators are crucial for standardizing and guaranteeing the quality of health care practices. The Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) launched the CUDERMA Project to define quality indicators for the certification of specialized units in dermatology; the first 2areas selected were psoriasis and dermato-oncology. The aim of this study was to achieve consensus on what should be evaluated by these indicators using a structured process comprising a literature review and selection of an initial list of indicators to be evaluated in a Delphi consensus study following review by a multidisciplinary group of experts. The selected indicators were evaluated by a panel of 28 dermatologists and classified as either «essential» or «of excellence». The panel agreed on 84 indicators, which will be standardized and used to develop the certification standard for dermato-oncology units (AU)

Los indicadores de calidad son una herramienta clave como garantía de calidad y homogenización de la asistencia sanitaria. En este contexto, la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología ha diseñado el proyecto CUDERMA (Certificación de unidades de dermatología), una iniciativa que busca definir indicadores de calidad para certificar unidades de dermatología en distintos ámbitos, entre los que se seleccionaron psoriasis y dermato-oncología de forma inicial. Este estudio tuvo por objetivo consensuar los aspectos a evaluar por los indicadores, siguiendo un proceso estructurado para la revisión bibliográfica y elaboración de un set preliminar de indicadores, revisado por un grupo multidisciplinar de expertos, para su evaluación mediante un Consenso Delphi. Un panel de 28 dermatólogos evaluó los indicadores y los clasificó como «básicos» o «de excelencia», generando un conjunto de 84 indicadores consensuados que serán estandarizados para diseñar la norma con la que certificar las unidades de dermato-oncología (AU)

Indicators to monitor the status of the tree of life.

Following the failure to fully achieve any of the 20 Aichi biodiversity targets, the future of biodiversity rests in the balance. The Convention on Biological Diversity's Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) presents the opportunity to preserve nature's contributions to people (NCPs) for current and future generations by conserving biodiversity and averting extinctions. There is a need to safeguard the tree of life-the unique and shared evolutionary history of life on Earth-to maintain the benefits it bestows into the future. Two indicators have been adopted within the GBF to monitor progress toward safeguarding the tree of life: the phylogenetic diversity (PD) indicator and the evolutionarily distinct and globally endangered (EDGE) index. We applied both to the world's mammals, birds, and cycads to show their utility at the global and national scale. The PD indicator can be used to monitor the overall conservation status of large parts of the evolutionary tree of life, a measure of biodiversity's capacity to maintain NCPs for future generations. The EDGE index is used to monitor the performance of efforts to conserve the most distinctive species. The risk to PD of birds, cycads, and mammals increased, and mammals exhibited the greatest relative increase in threatened PD over time. These trends appeared robust to the choice of extinction risk weighting. EDGE species had predominantly worsening extinction risk. A greater proportion of EDGE mammals (12%) had increased extinction risk compared with threatened mammals in general (7%). By strengthening commitments to safeguarding the tree of life, biodiversity loss can be reduced and thus nature's capacity to provide benefits to humanity now and in the future can be preserved.

Indicadores para monitorear el estado del árbol de la vida Resumen El futuro de la biodiversidad peligra tras no haberse logrado ninguno de los 20 Objetivos de Aichi. El Marco Global de Biodiversidad (GBF) de Kunming-Montreal del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica (CDB) representa la oportunidad de preservar las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas (PNC) para las generaciones actuales y futuras mediante la conservación de la biodiversidad y la prevención de las extinciones. Es necesario salvaguardar el árbol de la vida -la historia evolutiva única y compartida de la vida en la Tierra- para mantener en el futuro los beneficios que aporta. En el GBF se han adoptado dos indicadores para supervisar los avances hacia el cuidado del árbol de la vida: el indicador de diversidad filogenética y el índice de especies evolutivamente distintas y globalmente amenazadas (EDGE). Aplicamos ambos a los mamíferos, las aves y las cícadas del mundo para demostrar su utilidad a escala mundial y nacional. El indicador de diversidad filogenética puede utilizarse para supervisar el estado de conservación general de grandes partes del árbol evolutivo de la vida, una medida de la capacidad de la biodiversidad para mantener los PNC para las generaciones futuras. El índice EDGE se utiliza para supervisar el rendimiento de los esfuerzos por conservar las especies más distintivas. El riesgo para la diversidad filogenética de aves, cícadas y mamíferos aumentó, y los mamíferos mostraron el mayor aumento relativo de la diversidad filogenética amenazada a lo largo del tiempo. Estas tendencias parecieron sólidas a la hora de elegir la valoración del riesgo de extinción. Las especies EDGE tuvieron un riesgo de extinción predominante cada vez peor. Una mayor proporción de mamíferos EDGE (12%) presentó un riesgo de extinción creciente en comparación con los mamíferos amenazados en general (7%). Si se refuerza el compromiso de salvaguardar el árbol de la vida, se puede reducir la pérdida de biodiversidad y preservar así la capacidad de la naturaleza para proporcionar beneficios a la humanidad ahora y en el futuro.

NPS (Net Promoter Score). Métrica de la experiencia del cliente: construcción y análisis del indicador de una cobertura médica privada / NPS (Net Promoter Score), Customer experience metrics.: construction and analysis of the indicator of private medical coverage

Introducción: el NPS (Net Promoter Score) es un indicador que se utiliza en los programas de experiencia del cliente para medir la satisfacción de dicho público objetivo y su lealtad. Nuestra finalidad fue consolidar el NPS por primera vez en una prepaga de un hospital de alta complejidad de Buenos Aires (PS-HIBA) en busca de establecer un indicador objetivo desde la perspectiva del cliente. Métodos: se realizó un estudio observacional analítico, de corte transversal. Se incluyeron en el estudio los datos obtenidos a partir de las respuestas de los afiliados al PS-HIBA. Resultados: se consolidó el primer indicador NPS del PS-HIBA: 22 puntos. Se visualizaron los tres perfiles de clientes, obteniendo un 45,7% promotores, 22,3% detractores y 32% pasivos o neutros. Complementariamente se identificaron los motivos de dichas calificaciones; las tres principales fueron: la problemática de accesibilidad a los turnos, la atención y los profesionales valorados positivamente. Conclusión: este estudio aporta un indicador objetivo, que facilita un lenguaje común en la organización y una comparación con el mercado desde la mirada del cliente. El NPS, como sistema, busca impulsar la construcción de una cultura centrada en el cliente, con el fin de mejorar su lealtad y permitir una retroalimentación donde se logra tener presente la voz del cliente, e identificar, priorizar y abordar los problemas percibidos. Nos permite establecer los lineamientos de oportunidades de mejora desde la perspectiva de los pacientes. (AU)

Introduction: the NPS (Net Promoter Score) is an indicator used in customer experience programs to measure the satisfaction of said target audience and their loyalty. Our purpose was to send the survey and consolidate the NPS for the first time in a high complexity prepaid hospital in Buenos Aires (PS-HIBA) in search of an objective indicator from the customer's perspective. Methods: an analytical, cross-sectional observational study was carried out. Data obtained from members' responses to the PS-HIBA were included in the study. Results: the first NPS indicator of PS-HIBA was consolidated: 22 points. The three customer profiles were displayed, obtaining 45.7% promoters, 22.3% detractors and 32% passive or neutral. Complementarily, the reasons for these qualifications were identified, being the three main ones: the problem of accessibility to medical appointments, the medical attention and the professionals valued positively. Conclusion: this study provides an objective indicator which facilitates a common language in the organization and a comparison with the market from the customer's point of view.The NPS as a system seeks to promote the construction of a customer-focused culture, in order to improve their loyalty and allow feedback. Thus, it is possible to keep the customer's voice in mind, identify, prioritize and address the perceived problems. It allows us to establish the guidelines for opportunities to improve from the patients' perspective. (AU)

Pandemia da COVID-19 e as consequentes alterações comportamentais de uma comunidade universitária / COVID-19 pandemic and the consequent behavioral changes of a university community

Objetivou-se avaliar as variações comportamentais, estilo de vida e indicador nutricional de uma comunidade acadêmica antes e durante a pandemia de COVID-19. Estudo transversal, epidemio-lógico, com 1655 integrantes da Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Minas Gerais, de ambos os sexos e idades entre 17 a 72 anos. Via Google Forms, aplicou-se o questionário adaptado do "ConVid: Pes-quisa de Comportamentos", e a versão curta do IPAQ. Utilizou-se o teste de McNemar para compa-ração dos indicadores entre estilo de vida antes e durante a pandemia (p < 0,05) e regressão logística binária para associação com diagnóstico da COVID-19. Observou-se que durante a pandemia houve uma prevalência de aumento (p < 0,001) de indivíduos que não atingiram as recomendações para caminhada (42,8% para 80,6%); atividade física moderada (74,3% para 80,6%) e vigorosa (64,6% para 71,8%). Além disso, aumento no tempo de uso considerado elevado (p < 0,001), para televisão (2,4% para 12,7%) e computador/tablet (58,1% para 81,8%). O consumo de álcool passou de 64,1% para 64,9% (p < 0,001), enquanto o uso de cigarros foi de 5,7% para 7,8% (p < 0,001). A classifica-ção do indicador nutricional também demonstrou mudanças significativas (p < 0,001), o percentual de obesidade (7,7% para 11,1%) e sobrepeso (22,6% para 28,1%). O risco de contaminação para COVID-19 foi maior entre aqueles menos ativos (OR = 1,34; IC95%: 1,04 ­ 1,64). Os resultados demonstraram diminuição do nível de atividade física, aumento do tempo sedentário, piora no estilo de vida e aumento do excesso de peso dos estudantes e servidores de uma comunidade acadêmica, devido às consequências impostas pelo período pandêmico, elevando fatores de risco à saúde

The objective was to evaluate the behavioral variations, lifestyle and nutritional indicator of an academic community before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cross-sectional, epidemiological study with 1655 members of the Federal University of Viçosa, Minas Gerais, of both sexes, and aged between 17 and 72 years. Using Google Forms, the questionnaire adapted from "ConVid: Research of Behaviors" and the short version of the IPAQ were applied. The McNemar test was used to compare indicators between lifestyle before and during the pandemic (p < 0.05) and binary logistic regression for association with the diagnosis of COVID-19. It was observed that during the pandemic there was an increase in the prevalence (p < 0.001) of individuals who did not meet the recommendations for walking (42.8% to 80.6%); moderate (74.3% to 80.6%) and vigorous (64.6% to 71.8%) physical activity. In addition, an increase in the time of use consid-ered high (p < 0.001) for television (2.4% to 12.7%) and computer/tablet (58.1% to 81.8%). Alcohol con-sumption went from 64.1% to 64.9% (p < 0.001), while cigarette use went from 5.7% to 7.8% (p < 0.001). The classification of the nutritional indicator also showed significant changes (p < 0.001), the percentage of obesity (7.7% to 11.1%) and overweight (22.6% to 28.1%). The risk of contamination for COVID-19 was higher among those less active (OR = 1.34; 95%CI: 1.04 ­ 1.64). The results showed a decrease in the level of physical activity, an increase in sedentary time, a worsening lifestyle, and an increase in overweight among students and employees of an academic community, due to the consequences imposed by the pandemic period, increasing health risk factors

Selection of Quality Indicators for the Certification of Dermato-Oncology Units: The CUDERMA Project Delphi Consensus Study. / Proyecto CUDERMA: Consenso Delphi de los indicadores de calidad para la certificación de las unidades de dermatología de atención en dermato-oncología.

Quality indicators are crucial for standardizing and guaranteeing the quality of health care practices. The Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) launched the CUDERMA Project to define quality indicators for the certification of specialized units in dermatology; the first 2areas selected were psoriasis and dermato-oncology. The aim of this study was to achieve consensus on what should be evaluated by these indicators using a structured process comprising a literature review and selection of an initial list of indicators to be evaluated in a Delphi consensus study following review by a multidisciplinary group of experts. The selected indicators were evaluated by a panel of 28 dermatologists and classified as either «essential¼ or «of excellence¼. The panel agreed on 84 indicators, which will be standardized and used to develop the certification standard for dermato-oncology units.

Selection of Quality Indicators for the Certification of Psoriasis Units: The CUDERMA Project Delphi Consensus Study. / Proyecto CUDERMA: Consenso Delphi de los indicadores de calidad para la certificación de las unidades de dermatología de atención en psoriasis.

Defining quality indicators is a key strategy for ensuring the quality and standardization of health care. The CUDERMA project, an initiative of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venerology (AEDV), was undertaken to define quality indicators for the certification of specialized units in dermatology; the first 2 areas selected were psoriasis and dermato-oncology. The aim of this study was to reach a consensus on what should be assessed by the indicators used to certify psoriasis units. The structured process used to do this comprised a literature review to identify potential indicators, the selection of an initial set of indicators to be evaluated by a multidisciplinary group of experts and, finally, a Delphi consensus study. A panel of 39 dermatologists evaluated the selected indicators and classified them as either "essential" or "of excellence". Consensus was finally reached on 67 indicators, which will be standardized and used to develop the certification standard for psoriasis units.

Impacto de la COVID-19 sobre los indicadores hospitalarios: análisis de los grupos relacionados por el diagnóstico en un servicio de cirugía vascular / Impact of COVID-19 on key performance indicators: analysis of diagnosis related groups in a vascular surgery department

Objetivos: evaluar el impacto de la pandemia por la COVID-19 sobre una serie de indicadores funcionaleshospitalarios mediante el uso de grupos relacionados por el diagnóstico (GRD). Comparar los resultados del Servicio de Angiología, Cirugía Vascular y Endovascular (ACV) del Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes (HUCAB) con la base de datos del Ministerio de Sanidad.Material y métodos: altas hospitalarias del servicio de ACV del HUCAB durante los años 2019, 2020 y 2021. Se utilizó el sistema all patients refined (APR)-GRD para la codificación de altas. Los indicadores clave estudiados fueron: número de altas, mortalidad, estancia media (EM) y peso medio (PM) del GRD. Se estudiaron los resultados globales por año y en función de los GRD más prevalentes. Los resultados obtenidos se cotejaron con los datos anuales de la codifi cación del conjunto mínimo básico de datos (CMBD) del Ministerio de Sanidad. Se analizó también la EM ajustada por el funcionamiento del estándar (EMAF) y por la casuística (EMAC), el índice de EM ajustada (IEMA), el índice funcional (IF) y casuístico (IC) y el número de estancias evitables.Resultados:el número de altas en 2020 disminuyó un 10 % respecto a 2019. Las altas ligadas a ingresos desde Urgencias aumentaron en el GRD 181 más de un 50 % durante el año 2020 y más del 100 % en el año 2021 con respecto a 2019. Respecto a la mortalidad, no se constató un aumento signifi cativo de forma global. La EM disminuyó un 20 % en 2020 y un 18 % en 2021 respecto a 2019. El PM aumentó de forma progresiva hasta alcanzar una media de 7,7 % en 2021. La EMAF fue superior a la EM estándar y el número de estancias ahorradas fue superior al esperado.Conclusiones: la pandemia por la COVID-19 ha infl uido sobre los indicadores hospitalarios estudiados: han disminuido el número de altas y la EM y ha aumentando el PM de los GRD. El número de estancias evitables ahorradas ha sido mayor que el estándar.(AU)

Objectives: to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 on the hospital key performance indicators using the diagnosis-related groups (DRG). To compare the results of the Angiology and Vascular Surgery Department of the University Hospital of Cabueñes (HUCAB) with the database of the Ministry of Health.Material and methods: hospital discharges from the Vascular Surgery Department of the HUCAB during theyears 2019, 2020 and 2021. All patients refined (APR)-DRG system was extracted for discharge coding. The hospital key indicators studied were: number of discharges, mortality, mean stay (EM) and mean weight (PM) of the DRG. The overall results per year and according to the most prevalent DRGs were studied. The results obtained were compared with the annual data from the coding of the Minimum Basic Data Set (CMBD) of the Ministry of Health. The configured EM by adjusting the performance of the standard (EMAF) and by the casuistry (EMAC), the index of the adjusted EM (IEMA), the functional index (FI), casuistic index (CI) and the number of avoidable hospital stays were also analyzed. Results: number of discharges: it was 10 % inferior in 2020 compared to 2019. Discharges of the GRD 181 linked to admissions from the Emergency increased more than 50 % during 2020 and more than 100 % in 2021 compared to 2019. Mortality: there was no significant increase. EM: it decreased 20 % in 2020 and 18 % in 2021, compared to 2019. PM: it increased progressively to 7.7% on average in 2021. EMAF: it was superior to standard EM. The number of stays saved was higher than expected. Conclusions: the pandemic of COVID-19 influenced the hospital key performance indicators studied, reducing the number of discharges and ME and increasing the PM of the DRGs. The number of avoidable stays saved was greater than the standard.(AU)

Textbook outcome en cirugía gástrica oncológica, ¿qué implicaciones tiene sobre la supervivencia? / Textbook outcome in gastric surgery, what implications does it have on survival?

Introducción: El textbook outcome (TO), o resultado de libro, es una medida multidimensional para evaluar la calidad de la práctica asistencial. Ésta viene reflejada como el resultado quirúrgico «ideal», atendiendo a una serie de indicadores o puntos de referencia establecidos que se adaptan en función de la patología quirúrgica que queramos analizar. Son pocas las referencias bibliográficas y las series publicadas al respecto, todas ellas muy recientes. Objetivo: Valorar el grado de cumplimiento del TO y su impacto sobre la supervivencia. Método: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de todas las neoplasias gástricas intervenidas en nuestro centro. Periodo: desde enero del 2015 hasta diciembre del 2020. Se determinaron los siguientes criterios TO: márgenes R0, > 15 ganglios linfáticos en el estudio histológico, sin complicaciones mayores (Clavien-Dindo > IIIa), estancia hospitalaria < 21 días, no presentar mortalidad en los 30 días posoperatorios ni readmisión durante esos 30 días. Se realizó un análisis comparativo entre el grupo de TO vs. grupo no TO. Resultados: Se intervinieron 93 pacientes. Alcanzamos el TO en un 34,1% de los pacientes. La variable > 15 ganglios linfáticos fue la que más afectó a conseguir un TO Al realizar el análisis de supervivencia, observamos que el grupo en que se obtuvo el TO presentó mayor supervivencia (p < 0,008). Conclusión: En nuestra serie, la obtención del TO tiene impacto sobre la supervivencia con un grado de cumplimiento del 34,1%. (AU)

Introduction: The textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure to assess the quality of healthcare practice. This is reflected as the “ideal” surgical result, attending to a series of indicators or established reference points that are adapted depending on the surgical disease that we want to analyze. There are few references and series published about TO, all of them very recent. Objective: We present a series of gastric surgery from the TO perspective and we analyze its impact on survival. Method: Retrospective observational study of all gastric neoplasms operated on in our center. Period: January 2015 - December 2020. The criteria for TO were: margins R0, > 15 lymph nodes in the histological study, no Clavien-Dindo complications > IIIa, hospital stay < 21 days, no mortality or readmission in the 30 postoperative days. A comparative analysis was performed between the TO group versus the non-TO group. Results: 91 patients were operated on. We reached the TO in 34.1% of the patients. The variable > 15 lymph nodes was the one that most affected to achieve a TO. When performing the survival analysis, we obtained that the group in which the TO was obtained had a greater survival (p < 0.008). Conclusion: In our series, obtaining the TO has an impact on survival which 34,1% of degree of compliance. (AU)

Textbook outcome en cirugía gástrica oncológica, ¿qué implicaciones tiene sobre la supervivencia? / Textbook outcome in gastric surgery, what implications does it have on survival?

Introducción: El textbook outcome (TO), o resultado de libro, es una medida multidimensional para evaluar la calidad de la práctica asistencial. Ésta viene reflejada como el resultado quirúrgico «ideal», atendiendo a una serie de indicadores o puntos de referencia establecidos que se adaptan en función de la patología quirúrgica que queramos analizar. Son pocas las referencias bibliográficas y las series publicadas al respecto, todas ellas muy recientes. Objetivo: Valorar el grado de cumplimiento del TO y su impacto sobre la supervivencia. Método: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de todas las neoplasias gástricas intervenidas en nuestro centro. Periodo: desde enero del 2015 hasta diciembre del 2020. Se determinaron los siguientes criterios TO: márgenes R0, > 15 ganglios linfáticos en el estudio histológico, sin complicaciones mayores (Clavien-Dindo > IIIa), estancia hospitalaria < 21 días, no presentar mortalidad en los 30 días posoperatorios ni readmisión durante esos 30 días. Se realizó un análisis comparativo entre el grupo de TO vs. grupo no TO. Resultados: Se intervinieron 93 pacientes. Alcanzamos el TO en un 34,1% de los pacientes. La variable > 15 ganglios linfáticos fue la que más afectó a conseguir un TO Al realizar el análisis de supervivencia, observamos que el grupo en que se obtuvo el TO presentó mayor supervivencia (p < 0,008). Conclusión: En nuestra serie, la obtención del TO tiene impacto sobre la supervivencia con un grado de cumplimiento del 34,1%. (AU)

Introduction: The textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure to assess the quality of healthcare practice. This is reflected as the “ideal” surgical result, attending to a series of indicators or established reference points that are adapted depending on the surgical disease that we want to analyze. There are few references and series published about TO, all of them very recent. Objective: We present a series of gastric surgery from the TO perspective and we analyze its impact on survival. Method: Retrospective observational study of all gastric neoplasms operated on in our center. Period: January 2015 - December 2020. The criteria for TO were: margins R0, > 15 lymph nodes in the histological study, no Clavien-Dindo complications > IIIa, hospital stay < 21 days, no mortality or readmission in the 30 postoperative days. A comparative analysis was performed between the TO group versus the non-TO group. Results: 91 patients were operated on. We reached the TO in 34.1% of the patients. The variable > 15 lymph nodes was the one that most affected to achieve a TO. When performing the survival analysis, we obtained that the group in which the TO was obtained had a greater survival (p < 0.008). Conclusion: In our series, obtaining the TO has an impact on survival which 34,1% of degree of compliance. (AU)

Women Victims of Intimate Partner Violence and Intimate Partner Homicide: A Typology Based on Victimization Variables 1 / Las mujeres víctimas de violencia y homicidio de pareja: una tipología basada en variables de victimización

Intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) and intimate partner homicide against women (IPHAW) are multidimensional phenomena. The aim of this study was to identify typologies of Spanish IPHAW and IPVAW victims, based on the differences between their characteristics and the determinants of aggression. The sample consisted of 381 cases from the Spanish Integral Monitoring System in Cases of Gender Violence. The instrument used was a semi-structured interview. Results showed differences between IPHAW and IPVAW victims, and latent class analysis suggested a three-profile solution: 1-fatal victims, with low neuroticism, low isolation, and feelings of loneliness, less reconciliation with the aggressor, lower perception of risk and low suicidal ideation; 2-non-fatal victims, with the loss of a loved one and the role of caregiver as stressors, low psychoticism and alcohol abuse, high feelings of loneliness, risk perception, and suicidal ideation; 3-mixed profile, with high neuroticism and psychoticism, alcohol abuse, isolation, and greater reconciliations with the aggressor, and absence of bereavement and caregiver role as stressors. Knowing the differences between IPHAW and IPVAW victims allows the design of more specific instruments for risk assessment and the design of more individualized prevention and treatment programs. This also facilitates police work in identifying victims and deploying more intense protection measures. (AU)

La violencia de pareja contra la mujer (violencia de género, VdG) y el homicidio de pareja contra la mujer (feminicidio) son fenómenos multidimensionales. El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar las tipologías de las víctimas españolas de feminicidio y VdG, basado en las diferencias entre sus características y los determinantes de la agresión. La muestra constaba de 381 casos del Sistema Español de Seguimiento Integral de Casos de Violencia de Género. El instrumento utilizado fue una entrevista semiestructurada. Los resultados mostraron diferencias entre las víctimas de VdG y las víctimas de feminicidios y el análisis de clases latentes sugirió tres perfiles: 1-víctimas mortales, con bajo neuroticismo, bajo aislamiento y sentimientos de soledad, menor reconciliación con el agresor, menor percepción de riesgo y baja ideación suicida; 2-víctimas no mortales, con la pérdida de un ser querido y el rol de cuidador como estresores, bajo psicoticismo y abuso de alcohol, sentimientos de soledad elevados, percepción de riesgo e ideación suicida; 3-perfil mixto, con neuroticismo y psicoticismo elevados, abuso de alcohol, aislamiento y una mayor reconciliación con el agresor y ausencia de duelo y del rol de cuidador como estresores. Conocer las diferencias entre víctimas de feminicidio y de VdG permite el diseño de instrumentos más específicos para la evaluación del riesgo y el diseño de programas de prevención y tratamiento más individualizados. También facilita la labor policial en la identificación de las víctimas y el despliegue de medidas de protección más intensas. (AU)

Textbook outcome in gastric surgery, what implications does it have on survival?

INTRODUCTION: The textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure to assess the quality of healthcare practice. This is reflected as the "ideal" surgical result, attending to a series of indicators or established reference points that are adapted depending on the surgical disease that we want to analyze. There are few references and series published about TO, all of them very recent. OBJECTIVE: We present a series of gastric surgery from the TO perspective and we analyze its impact on survival. METHOD: Retrospective observational study of all gastric neoplasms operated on in our center. PERIOD: January 2015-December 2020. The criteria for TO were: margins R0, >15 lymph nodes in the histological study, no Clavien-Dindo complications > IIIa, hospital stay < 21 days, no mortality or readmission in the 30 postoperative days. A comparative analysis was performed between the TO group versus the non-TO group. RESULTS: 91 patients were operated on. We reached the TO in 34.1% of the patients. The variable >15 lymph nodes was the one that most affected to achieve a TO. When performing the survival analysis, we obtained that the group in which the TO was obtained had a greater survival (p < 0.008). CONCLUSION: In our series, obtaining the TO has an impact on survival which 34,1% of degree of compliance.

Comparison of different diagnostic modalities for isolation of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis among suspected tuberculous lymphadenitis patients / Comparação de diferentes modalidades de diagnóstico para isolamento de Mycobacterium tuberculosis entre pacientes com suspeita de linfadenite tuberculosa

Tuberculosis is a communicable disease with high morbidity and mortality rates in developing countries. The study's primary objective is to compare conventional methods such as acid-fast bacillus (AFB) culture and microscopy with rapid diagnostic methods. The secondary objective is to compare histopathological and microbiological findings in suspected patients with tubercular lymphadenitis. A total of 111 samples (August 2018 to September 2019) of lymph nodes were processed for AFB microscopy, AFB cultures, drug-susceptibility testing (DST), histopathology, and Xpert Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (MTB)/resistance to Rifampin (RIF) assays. Out of 111 lymph node samples, 6 (5.4%) were positive for AFB smear microscopy, 84 (75.6%) were positive for AFB culture, 80 (70.7%) were positive on Gene Xpert, and 102 (91.8%) were indicative of tuberculosis for histopathology studies. Mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) culture positivity was 84 (75.6%) higher than solid Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture 74 (66.6%). Positive cultures underwent phenotypic DST. Two cases were Multidrug-resistant (MDR) on DST, while three cases were Rifampicin resistant on Gene Xpert. The sensitivity of Genexpert was (62%) against the conventional AFB culture method. The poor performance of conventional lymphadenitis diagnostic methods requires early and accurate diagnostic methodology. Xpert MTB/RIF test can help in the treatment of multidrug-resistant TB cases. Nonetheless, rapid and conventional methods should be used for complete isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

A tuberculose é uma doença transmissível com altas taxas de morbimortalidade nos países em desenvolvimento. O objetivo principal do estudo é comparar métodos convencionais, como cultura de bacilo álcool-ácido resistente (BAAR) e microscopia, com métodos de diagnóstico rápido. O objetivo secundário é comparar os achados histopatológicos e microbiológicos em pacientes com suspeita de linfadenite tubercular. Um total de 111 amostras (agosto de 2018 a setembro de 2019) de gânglios linfáticos foi processado para microscopia de AFB, culturas de AFB, teste de susceptibilidade a drogas (DST), histopatologia e Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)/ensaios de resistência à rifampicina (RIF). Das 111 amostras de linfonodos, 6 (5,4%) foram positivas para baciloscopia de AFB, 84 (75,6%) foram positivas para cultura de AFB, 80 (70,7%) foram positivas para o GeneXpert e 102 (91,8%) foram indicativas de tuberculose para estudos histopatológicos. A positividade da cultura do tubo indicador de crescimento de micobactérias (MGIT) foi 84 (75,6%), maior que a cultura sólida de Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ), 74 (66,6%). As culturas positivas foram submetidas a DST fenotípico. Dois casos eram multirresistentes (MDR) ao DST, enquanto três casos eram resistentes à rifampicina no GeneXpert. A sensibilidade do GeneXpert foi 62% contra o método convencional de cultura AFB. O fraco desempenho dos métodos convencionais de diagnóstico de linfadenite requer metodologia de diagnóstico precoce e precisa. O teste Xpert MTB/RIF pode ajudar no tratamento de casos de tuberculose multirresistente. No entanto, métodos rápidos e convencionais devem ser usados para o isolamento completo do Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Comparison of different diagnostic modalities for isolation of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis among suspected tuberculous lymphadenitis patients

Abstract Tuberculosis is a communicable disease with high morbidity and mortality rates in developing countries. The study's primary objective is to compare conventional methods such as acid-fast bacillus (AFB) culture and microscopy with rapid diagnostic methods. The secondary objective is to compare histopathological and microbiological findings in suspected patients with tubercular lymphadenitis. A total of 111 samples (August 2018 to September 2019) of lymph nodes were processed for AFB microscopy, AFB cultures, drug-susceptibility testing (DST), histopathology, and Xpert Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (MTB)/resistance to Rifampin (RIF) assays. Out of 111 lymph node samples, 6 (5.4%) were positive for AFB smear microscopy, 84 (75.6%) were positive for AFB culture, 80 (70.7%) were positive on Gene Xpert, and 102 (91.8%) were indicative of tuberculosis for histopathology studies. Mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) culture positivity was 84 (75.6%) higher than solid Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture 74 (66.6%). Positive cultures underwent phenotypic DST. Two cases were Multidrug-resistant (MDR) on DST, while three cases were Rifampicin resistant on Gene Xpert. The sensitivity of Genexpert was (62%) against the conventional AFB culture method. The poor performance of conventional lymphadenitis diagnostic methods requires early and accurate diagnostic methodology. Xpert MTB/RIF test can help in the treatment of multidrug-resistant TB cases. Nonetheless, rapid and conventional methods should be used for complete isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Resumo A tuberculose é uma doença transmissível com altas taxas de morbimortalidade nos países em desenvolvimento. O objetivo principal do estudo é comparar métodos convencionais, como cultura de bacilo álcool-ácido resistente (BAAR) e microscopia, com métodos de diagnóstico rápido. O objetivo secundário é comparar os achados histopatológicos e microbiológicos em pacientes com suspeita de linfadenite tubercular. Um total de 111 amostras (agosto de 2018 a setembro de 2019) de gânglios linfáticos foi processado para microscopia de AFB, culturas de AFB, teste de susceptibilidade a drogas (DST), histopatologia e Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)/ensaios de resistência à rifampicina (RIF). Das 111 amostras de linfonodos, 6 (5,4%) foram positivas para baciloscopia de AFB, 84 (75,6%) foram positivas para cultura de AFB, 80 (70,7%) foram positivas para o GeneXpert e 102 (91,8%) foram indicativas de tuberculose para estudos histopatológicos. A positividade da cultura do tubo indicador de crescimento de micobactérias (MGIT) foi 84 (75,6%), maior que a cultura sólida de Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ), 74 (66,6%). As culturas positivas foram submetidas a DST fenotípico. Dois casos eram multirresistentes (MDR) ao DST, enquanto três casos eram resistentes à rifampicina no GeneXpert. A sensibilidade do GeneXpert foi 62% contra o método convencional de cultura AFB. O fraco desempenho dos métodos convencionais de diagnóstico de linfadenite requer metodologia de diagnóstico precoce e precisa. O teste Xpert MTB/RIF pode ajudar no tratamento de casos de tuberculose multirresistente. No entanto, métodos rápidos e convencionais devem ser usados para o isolamento completo do Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Comparison of different diagnostic modalities for isolation of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis among suspected tuberculous lymphadenitis patients / Comparação de diferentes modalidades de diagnóstico para isolamento de Mycobacterium tuberculosis entre pacientes com suspeita de linfadenite tuberculosa

Abstract Tuberculosis is a communicable disease with high morbidity and mortality rates in developing countries. The study's primary objective is to compare conventional methods such as acid-fast bacillus (AFB) culture and microscopy with rapid diagnostic methods. The secondary objective is to compare histopathological and microbiological findings in suspected patients with tubercular lymphadenitis. A total of 111 samples (August 2018 to September 2019) of lymph nodes were processed for AFB microscopy, AFB cultures, drug-susceptibility testing (DST), histopathology, and Xpert Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (MTB)/resistance to Rifampin (RIF) assays. Out of 111 lymph node samples, 6 (5.4%) were positive for AFB smear microscopy, 84 (75.6%) were positive for AFB culture, 80 (70.7%) were positive on Gene Xpert, and 102 (91.8%) were indicative of tuberculosis for histopathology studies. Mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) culture positivity was 84 (75.6%) higher than solid Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture 74 (66.6%). Positive cultures underwent phenotypic DST. Two cases were Multidrug-resistant (MDR) on DST, while three cases were Rifampicin resistant on Gene Xpert. The sensitivity of Genexpert was (62%) against the conventional AFB culture method. The poor performance of conventional lymphadenitis diagnostic methods requires early and accurate diagnostic methodology. Xpert MTB/RIF test can help in the treatment of multidrug-resistant TB cases. Nonetheless, rapid and conventional methods should be used for complete isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Resumo A tuberculose é uma doença transmissível com altas taxas de morbimortalidade nos países em desenvolvimento. O objetivo principal do estudo é comparar métodos convencionais, como cultura de bacilo álcool-ácido resistente (BAAR) e microscopia, com métodos de diagnóstico rápido. O objetivo secundário é comparar os achados histopatológicos e microbiológicos em pacientes com suspeita de linfadenite tubercular. Um total de 111 amostras (agosto de 2018 a setembro de 2019) de gânglios linfáticos foi processado ​​para microscopia de AFB, culturas de AFB, teste de susceptibilidade a drogas (DST), histopatologia e Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)/ensaios de resistência à rifampicina (RIF). Das 111 amostras de linfonodos, 6 (5,4%) foram positivas para baciloscopia de AFB, 84 (75,6%) foram positivas para cultura de AFB, 80 (70,7%) foram positivas para o GeneXpert e 102 (91,8%) foram indicativas de tuberculose para estudos histopatológicos. A positividade da cultura do tubo indicador de crescimento de micobactérias (MGIT) foi 84 (75,6%), maior que a cultura sólida de Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ), 74 (66,6%). As culturas positivas foram submetidas a DST fenotípico. Dois casos eram multirresistentes (MDR) ao DST, enquanto três casos eram resistentes à rifampicina no GeneXpert. A sensibilidade do GeneXpert foi 62% contra o método convencional de cultura AFB. O fraco desempenho dos métodos convencionais de diagnóstico de linfadenite requer metodologia de diagnóstico precoce e precisa. O teste Xpert MTB/RIF pode ajudar no tratamento de casos de tuberculose multirresistente. No entanto, métodos rápidos e convencionais devem ser usados ​​para o isolamento completo do Mycobacterium tuberculosis.